MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1590066516 · doi:10.1177/07067437070526s101

Caring for the Suicidal Patient

2007· editorial· en· W1590066516 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Isaac Sakinofsky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2007
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesConsciencePsychologyPsychiatrySuicide preventionPoison controlMedicinePsychotherapistPsychoanalysisPhilosophyMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tout le traitement de cette maladie repose sur la division établie par le titre du livre.En admettant des suicides avec ou sans conscience, nous reconnaisons que la thérapeutique doit former deux sections différentes, suivant l'etat de raison ou de délire.Il y a cependant, dans ce dernier cas une distinction importante B faire.L'aliéné, dans quelques circonstances, peut avoir la conscience de son acte, savoir qu'il fait mal; mais il cede B une impulsion plus forte que sa volonté, B un entraînement irrésistible.-A Brierre de Boismont Du Suicide et de la Folie Suicide, 1856

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0180.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry→Same topicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies→French-language works237,207→