MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1590168450 · doi:10.1002/9780470054581.eib240

Conifers: Culture and Genetic Engineering

2009· other· en· W1590168450 on OpenAlexaff
J. M. Bonga, Patrick von Aderkas, Krystyna Klimaszewska

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Industrial Biotechnology · 2009
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReforestationBiologySomatic embryogenesisSowingAgroforestryBotanyEmbryoEmbryogenesisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Conifer biotechnology has advanced greatly in the last couple of decades. Even though much of the field is still experimental, improvements in somatic embryogenesis and cryopreservation protocols have resulted in the production of genetically improved planting stock for reforestation. This technology has been most effective for some of the spruce, pine, and Larix species as well as for Douglas fir. Other conifer species have been less responsive, and effective application procedures remain to be established. Genetic engineering is still largely confined to the experimental and field‐testing stage, but applications in the field of pathogen and pest resistance and some other features can be expected in the near future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0030.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Industrial BiotechnologySame topicPlant tissue culture and regenerationFrench-language works237,207