MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1590179385

ANALISIS PENGARUH LIKUIDITAS, WAKTU JATUH TEMPO DAN KUPON OBLIGASI TERHADAP PERUBAHAN HARGA OBLIGASI KORPORASI DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA

2015· article· id· W1590179385 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
I Ketut Subagia, Ida Bagus Panji Sedana

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Market liquidityBondBusinessMaturity (psychological)Stock exchangeCouponFinancial systemFinancePsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of liquidity, maturity and coupon bonds to changes in prices corporate bonds. This research was conducted at the companies which issuing corporate bonds in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the first quarter of 2013 until the second quarter of 2014. The samples used in this study were 54 corporate bonds. Based on the results of the analysis found that liquidity significant and positive impact on price changes corporate bonds first quarter of 2013 until the second quarter of 2014. Maturity significant and positively related on price changes corporate bonds first quarter of 2013 until the second quarter of 2014. Coupon not significant and not positively influence on price changes corporate bonds first quarter of 2013 until the second quarter of 2014.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFinancial Analysis and Corporate GovernanceFrench-language works237,207