MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1590228508 · doi:10.1109/ceit.2015.7233057

State space modeling and performance analysis of self-excited induction generators for wind simulation

2015· article· en· W1590228508 on OpenAlexaff
Allal M. Bouzid, A. Chériti, Pierre Sicard, Mohamed Bouhamida, Mustapha Benghanem

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduction generatorCapacitanceControl theory (sociology)ExcitationState spaceGenerator (circuit theory)State-space representationStationary Reference FrameDoubly fed electric machinePhase spaceExcited stateWind powerComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringAC powerPower (physics)Induction motorMathematicsElectrical engineeringVoltageAtomic physicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, it has been proven that one of the main issues in isolated applications is the importance of the dynamic characteristics assessment of three phase self-excited induction generator (SEIG). This paper presents a generalized state-space dynamic model using D-Q stationary reference frame of such a three phase SEIG. The values of self-excitation capacitance and the minimum and maximum speeds necessary to initialize the self-excitation are determined. The effect of variation of excitation capacitance and variation of SEIG loads are determined by simulation. The analysis of the results could help to determine the efficiency solutions for the system to supply isolated areas even when the loads are unbalanced

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207