Savoir, curricula et méthodes pédagogiques : le cas de l’Inde
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans ce court article, je brosse un bref panorama de ce que je considre comme les phases majeures du curriculum et de l'enseignement indiens, de la priode prcdant l'indpendance jusqu' l'poque actuelle. Il s'agit l d'une esquisse rapide d'un pays complexe, l'histoire complexe. Je n'ai pas dvelopp l'ide du rgionalisme, pas plus que je n'ai explor la question des peuples tribaux d'Inde, qui prsentent pourtant une srie de problmes et de questions dignes d'attention. Je n'ai pas non plus trait de la formation des enseignants. J'ai cherch en revanche prsenter un point de vue plus national . En matire ducative, j'ai essay de dfinir les ides cls -en termes de curriculum et de pdagogie -qui ont domin chaque priode. Loin de supplanter l'tape prcdente, chaque nouvelle phase s'ajoute la prcdente, ce qui fait que de multiples ides peuvent coexister et tre lgitimes un moment donn.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it