MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1590414169 · doi:10.7202/1007848ar

Les effets indésirables des médicaments de substitution dans le traitement de la dépendance aux opioïdes

2012· article· fr· W1590414169 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Pierre Lauzon

Bibliographic record

VenueDrogues santé et société · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGynecologyMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le traitement de substitution, principalement avec la méthadone ou la buprénorphine, représente le traitement le plus efficace de la dépendance des opioïdes. Ces médicaments doivent, la plupart du temps, être pris pendant des périodes prolongées, soit plusieurs années ou toute la vie pour certains. Ces médicaments peuvent avoir des effets indésirables, ayant un impact sur la qualité de vie des patients, et nécessitent une attention de la part des professionnels de la santé impliqués dans le traitement. Seront révisés les effets indésirables suivants : hypogonadisme masculin, allongement du QT, sevrage néonatal, anomalies des fonctions respiratoires, hyperalgésie, risque d’intoxication, abus de la médication, interactions médicamenteuses. À ces effets pharmacologiques viennent s’ajouter des contraintes réglementaires, qui, si elles peuvent être pertinentes en début de traitement, s’avèrent lourdes et inadaptées pour les patients stables depuis plusieurs années. De l’écoute et une bonne gestion de ces effets indésirables sont indispensables pour améliorer l’acceptabilité du traitement et son attrait pour les usagers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrogues santé et sociétéSame topicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesFrench-language works237,207