MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1590504435 · doi:10.1029/2003wr002410

Modeling the effect of development on internal phosphorus load in nutrient‐poor lakes

2004· article· en· W1590504435 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gertrud K. Nürnberg, Bruce D. LaZerte

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental sciencePhosphorusWater qualityNutrientHydrology (agriculture)SedimentAnoxic watersEcologyGeologyChemistryGeotechnical engineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A steady state lake phosphorus (P) mass balance model was used to predict the equilibrium P concentration (annual, volume‐weighted average) of the lake water from natural and anthropogenic, external and internal P inputs. Internal P load was modeled as the product of sediment release rates and anoxic factors. Both these components were predicted from lake P concentration computed from external load to create a link between external and internal load components. Such estimates allow the modeling and setting of objectives of several hundred lakes on the Canadian Shield. In particular, estimates of predevelopment lake P concentration made by removing all anthropogenic inputs were compared with postdevelopment conditions in which additional loading was added to the model. This was accomplished by determining how much development would increase external as well as internal phosphorus load and ultimately annual average lake P concentrations. By comparing proposed lake development scenarios with existing or predevelopment scenarios, it can be determined whether water quality objectives will be exceeded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207