MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Postnatal Development and Regulation of β‐Hexosaminidase in Epithelial Cells of the Rat Epididymis

2004· article· en· W1590566873 on OpenAlexafffund
Louis Hermo, Huzaifa Adamali, Jacquetta M. Trasler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Andrology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's HospitalMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsEpididymisEfferent ductsImmunostainingBiologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineCholangiocyteImmunocytochemistryEpitheliumEfferentHexosaminidaseImmunohistochemistryAndrologyCell biologySpermImmunologyEnzymeBiochemistryAnatomyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

beta-Hexosaminidase (Hex) catalyzes the hydrolysis of terminal sugar residues from a number of substrates such as GM2 gangliosides, glycoproteins, glycolipids, and glycosaminoglycans. As an enzyme present in lysosomes of epithelial cells of the adult rat epididymis, it serves to degrade substances endocytosed from the epididymal lumen. In this way, it modifies and creates a luminal environment where sperm can undergo their maturational modifications. In this study, the postnatal developmental pattern of expression of Hex was examined in animals from days 7-56. In addition, the role of testicular factors on Hex expression in the different cell types and regions of the epididymis of adult rats was examined in orchidectomized and efferent duct-ligated rats. Both parameters were examined on Bouin-fixed epididymides in conjunction with light microscope immunocytochemistry. At postnatal day 7, the epithelium of the entire epididymis was unreactive for anti-Hex antibody. By day 21, narrow and clear cells of their respective regions became reactive, whereas basal cells became reactive only by day 29. Principal cells displayed only an occasional reactive lysosome at day 21, several by day 29, and numerous reactive lysosomes by day 39, comparable to the region-specific distribution noted for 90-day-old animals, and at an age when high androgen levels are attained. Thus, postnatal onset of Hex expression varies according to the different cell types of the epididymis, suggesting different regulatory factors. This finding was confirmed from studies employing adult orchidectomized and efferent duct-ligated adult rats. Indeed, in all experimental animals, Hex immunostaining in narrow, clear, and basal cells was intense and comparable to control animals. In contrast, there was a notable absence of lysosomal staining in principal cells at all time points after orchidectomy, which was restored, however, following testosterone replacement. No effect on Hex expression was observed in efferent duct-ligated animals. Taken together, the data suggest that Hex expression in lysosomes of principal cells is regulated by testosterone or one of its metabolites. However, the expression of Hex being independent of testicular factors in narrow, clear, and basal cells of adult animals, but occurring at different time points during postnatal development, suggests that different regulatory factors are responsible for onset of Hex expression in these cell types during development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of AndrologySame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207