A la recherche des contraintes intergenerationnelles d'emprunt chez les hommes canadiens : tests de regression par quantile et de regression des moindres carres pour les contraintes imperatives d'emprunt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plusieurs articles recents ont souligne la non-linearite de la relation entre le revenu des parents et celui de leurs enfants pour expliquer les contraintes intergenerationnelles considerables au chapitre du credit. Dans le present article, nous soutenons que toute tendance, quelle qu'elle soit, relative a la fonction d'esperance conditionnelle peut etre justifiee par une explication bien construite axee sur les contraintes d'emprunt, ce qui souleve des questions quant a la validite de cette approche. Les regressions par quantile constituent un test de substitution. A la lumiere de donnees tirees des dossiers fiscaux canadiens, le present article fait etat de resultats allant a l'encontre de l'hypothese des contraintes d'emprunt : la non-linearite de la fonction de regression est attribuable aux fils ayant peu de capacites (non assujettis a des contraintes) plutot qu'aux fils ayant des capacites importantes (vraisemblablement assujettis a des contraintes).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".