MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1590606133 · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2004.1373812

A reduced-complexity soft-input soft-output detection scheme for wideband MIMO channels

2005· article· en· W1590606133 on OpenAlexafffund
Y.L.C. de Jong, T.J. Willink

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
FundersMinistère de la Défense NationaleDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsTrellis (graph)MIMOComputer scienceAlgorithmComputational complexity theoryDetectorReduction (mathematics)Trellis modulationWidebandTurbo codeChannel (broadcasting)Interference (communication)Quadrature amplitude modulationModulation (music)Bit error rateElectronic engineeringDecoding methodsFadingMathematicsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a reduced-complexity soft-input soft-output detection scheme for wideband space-time bit-interleaved coded modulation (ST-BICM) MIMO systems. This scheme, which is referred to as iterative trellis search detection, is based in part on a reduced-complexity variant of the BCJR algorithm. It also uses signal sets with block partitioning labeling, called multilevel mapping constellations, in order to achieve further complexity reduction for higher-order QAM modulation formats. Results from computer simulations of an iterative ("turbo") MlMO receiver employing the new scheme have shown that it successfully eliminates the error floor that occurs if inter-symbol interference is not mitigated. It is also shown that the optimum choice of the number of fingers employed by the detector is not only dependent on the channel characteristics, but also by the fraction of states considered in the trellis search.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207