MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1590610492 · doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-072-8-11

The influence of noise on the dynamics of Random Boolean Network

2009· book-chapter· en· W1590610492 on OpenAlexaff
A. Barbieri, Marco Villani, Roberto Serra, Stuart Kauffman, Annamaria Colacci

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamics (music)Boolean networkRandom noiseNoise (video)Computer scienceStatistical physicsPsychologyPhysicsBoolean functionArtificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since real networks are noisy systems, in this work we investigate the dynamics of a deterministic model of gene networks affected by small random fluctuations. In this case jumps among different attractors are possible, thereby leading to an asymptotic dynamics different from that of the underlying deterministic model. The significance of the jumps among attractors is discussed. A key control parameter of this phenomenon is the size of the network, a fact that could lead to interesting consequences for the theories of natural and artificial evolving systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in artificial intelligence and applicationsSame topicGene Regulatory Network AnalysisFrench-language works237,207