MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1590684418 · doi:10.4271/2010-01-2168

Effects of Cetane Number, Aromatic Content and 90% Distillation Temperature on HCCI Combustion of Diesel Fuels

2010· article· en· W1590684418 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsShell (Canada)National Research Council Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsCetane numberDiesel fuelCombustionDistillationHomogeneous charge compression ignitionWaste managementAutomotive engineeringProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceChemistryBiodieselCombustion chamberOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The effects of cetane number, aromatics content and 90% distillation temperature (T90) on HCCI combustion were investigated using a fuel matrix designed by the Fuels for Advanced Combustion Engines (FACE) Working Group of the Coordinating Research Council (CRC). The experiments were conducted in a single-cylinder, variable compression ratio, Cooperative Fuel Research (CFR) engine. The fuels were atomized and partially vaporized in the intake manifold. The engine was operated at a relative air/fuel ratio of 1.2, 60% exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and 900 rpm. The compression ratio was varied over the range of 9:1 to 15:1 to optimize the combustion phasing for each fuel, keeping other operating parameters constant.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The results show that cetane number and T90 distillation temperature significantly affected the combustion phasing. Cetane number was clearly found to have the strongest effect. An increase in cetane number or a decrease in the T90 distillation temperature advanced the combustion phasing. The cetane number effect is related to increased low temperature heat release (LTHR) with increasing cetane number. The T90 effect is primarily due to a change in the physical delay period associated with preparation of the fuel-air mixture. At a similar combustion phasing, the high CN fuels exhibited significantly longer combustion duration than the low CN fuels. The best fuel conversion efficiencies were generally achieved with the four low cetane number fuels (FACE No. 1-4) as optimized combustion phasing occurred at a higher compression ratio. However, the two fuels with high CN and low T90 (FACE No. 5 and 7) also produced high fuel conversion efficiencies, although at a slightly lower compression ratio. These two fuels (FACE No. 5 and 7) produced the lowest indicated specific HC (isHC) emissions. This is due to the combined effects of high fuel volatility and reactivity that resulted in a more efficient combustion process. FACE No. 8, which has high CN and high T90, produced notably higher isHC emissions when the combustion phasing was in the range of 0° to 10°CA, aTDC. FACE No. 6 and 8, which have high CN and high T90, produced higher isCO emissions when the combustion phasing was retarded. The isNO<sub>x</sub> emissions were extremely low (below 0.008 g/kWh) for all fuels. Aromatic content did not directly affect the combustion phasing or emissions behavior.</div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it