La reaction du marche boursier Canadien suite a la declaration des transactions d'actions des inities dans le SEDI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le but de cette recherche est d’étudier la réaction du marché boursier canadien lorsque les opérations d’achat et de vente effectuées par les différents initiés sont déclarées dans le SEDI. Les résultats montrent que seules les ventes de certaines catégories d’initiés signalent de l’information négative au marché pendant la période 2006-2008. Ils nous permettent aussi d’affirmer que les transactions boursières des dirigeants-administrateurs de l’émetteur influencent plus le marché que celles des dirigeants- administrateurs d’une filiale de l’émetteur. Enfin, d’après nos résultats, il semble que la réaction du marché suite aux opérations boursières d’initiés peut être influencée par la tendance du marché boursier (haussier ou baissier) qui prévaut pendant la période de l’étude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".