<i>Medicine ThatWalks: Disease, Medicine, and Canadian Plains Native People, 1880–1940</i>. By Maureen K. Lux (Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2001) 230 pp. $50.00 cloth $22.95 paper
Bibliographic record
Abstract
April 01 2003 Medicine ThatWalks: Disease, Medicine, and Canadian Plains Native People, 1880–1940 Medicine ThatWalks: Disease, Medicine, and Canadian Plains Native People, 1880–1940. By Maureen K.Lux (Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2001) 230 pp. $50.00 cloth $22.95 paper Mary-Ellen Kelm Mary-Ellen Kelm University of Northern British Columbia Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Mary-Ellen Kelm University of Northern British Columbia Online ISSN: 1530-9169 Print ISSN: 0022-1953 © 2003 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the editors of The Journal of Interdisciplinary History2003 The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (2003) 33 (4): 673–674. https://doi.org/10.1162/00221950360537098 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Mary-Ellen Kelm; Medicine ThatWalks: Disease, Medicine, and Canadian Plains Native People, 1880–1940. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 2003; 33 (4): 673–674. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/00221950360537098 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2003 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the editors of The Journal of Interdisciplinary History2003 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.175 | 0.042 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".