MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1590808711 · doi:10.1111/pala.12001

The development and shell microstructure of the pseudodeltidium and interarea in thecideide brachiopods

2013· article· en· W1590808711 on OpenAlexaff
Alan Logan, Peter G. Baker

Bibliographic record

VenuePalaeontology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJuvenileOntogenyPaleontologyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: This study examines the development of the delthyrium, pseudodeltidium and interarea, their growth during the early juvenile stages of ontogeny and the extrapolation of morphology from adult shells to the probable juvenile state. Examination of the development and shell microstructure of the cardinalia of early juvenile thecideide brachiopod ventral valves from Jurassic, Cretaceous and Holocene specimens suggests that the delthyrium develops early in ontogeny and that the initial development of the pseudodeltidium precedes that of the interarea. Also, until the interarea is formed, the postero‐lateral flanks of the ventral umbo are palintropic. The development of the interarea can be seen to be a consequence of the lateral extension of the early juvenile hinge line. Initially, the pseudodeltidium consists solely of a thin plate of primary shell material. Comparison of the morphology of the pseudodeltidium of early juveniles with that of adults suggests that the initially curved lateral profile of the pseudodeltidium is retained, or even accentuated, in the ontogeny of lacazellines, but in all thecidellinines, with the exception of Pachymoorellina and Minutella , following the appearance of the interarea, the pseudodeltidium becomes flattened and often appears continuous with the interarea. However, we do not support any proposal that suggests that, in thecideides, only those forms in which the delthyrium is closed by a dorsally convex plate should be considered to possess a pseudodeltidium sensu stricto , mainly because of physiological differences and the prospect of possible taxonomic confusion in the future. Instead, we propose the term planodeltidium for a flat pseudodeltidium, typically developed in the thecidellinines, and rugideltidium for a convex pseudodeltidium, typically developed in the lacazellines, but also in Pachymoorellina and Minutella . Despite the presence of a rugideltidium, we believe the affinities of Minutella are more strongly with the thecidellinines and have included it in the new subfamily Minutellinae of the family Thecidellinidae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalaeontologySame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207