MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1590818177

The Living Earth and Its Ethical Priority

2003· article· en· W1590818177 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stan Rowe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Philosophy and Ethics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarth (classical element)Environmental ethicsContext (archaeology)Earth system scienceDeconstruction (building)AstrobiologyHumanityEcologyGeographyPhilosophyPolitical scienceBiologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stan Rowe is a retired ecology teacher, professor emeritus at the University of Saskatchewan, and is interested in Earth-human relationships and especially ecospheric ethics. Author of the book Home Place and of numerous essays published in The Structurist, he lives happily in the mountainous terrain of New Denver, British Columbia. “Living Earth ” means that Earth is the carrier of the vitalizing essence or animating principle here capitalized as “Life ” to differentiate it from “life ” as traditionally associated with organic things alone. Planet Earth exhibits cyclic processes of organic construction known as “aliveness” and of inorganic/organic deconstruction named “deadness, ” and the various states or phases of these closely integrated processes have developed within and dependently on Earth’s air-water-land ecosystems—named “geoecosystems ” because they are place-specific. Thus Earth, the Ecosphere, and its sectoral geoecosystems—resembling mega-terrariums and mega-aquariums with all their organic/inorganic contents—have from the beginning of time been the evolutionary source and purveyors of Life. Metaphorical language has equated life only with organisms. Ecological knowledge, by revealing the importance of context, shows that Earth is synonymous with Life in its l d i d of e tic i i

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.049
Scholarly communication0.0120.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0070.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsFrench-language works237,207