MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1590857235

Clancy Departs Dog Eat Bone World: Richard Freadman remembers Laurie Clancy

2014· article· en· W1590857235 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard Freadman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrishFace (sociological concept)Quarter (Canadian coin)Meaning (existential)Rhetorical questionArt historyArtDreamHistoryRhetoricPerformance artLiteraturePsychologyPhilosophyTheologyLinguisticsArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of my first sightings of Laurie was in a framed photo in the old Eagle Bar at La Trobe University. Entitled 'The Coach,' the photo featured a young and rather fit-looking Captain Coach addressing his players at the quarter or three-quarter time break. The players, it has to be said, look completely uninterested in proceedings; but according to the picture's caption Laurie is pulling out all the rhetorical stops. The caption reads:Senior Lecturer in English Laurie Clancy urges on the football team in mid-1969 with accounts of existentialism and the thinking of Kierkegarrd.Laurie was one of those naturally funny people. Great company and a marvellous droll wit, he could also be hilarious without meaning to. Tall and angular with huge ruckman's hands, bulbous eyes and a 'bog-Irish' face, he often looked abstracted, as if on the way to, or perhaps recovering from, a hangover. And indeed this was not infrequently the case. Laurie, as they say, liked a drink. One of his fictional characters, taking a leaf out of his author's book, frames the motto 'in vino veritas' for himself. A refugee from a stern Catholic childhood, Laurie the writer could still put liturgical Latin to good use.An appearance of slightly shambolic approximation about Laurie was both accurate and misleading. Ann Blake, a colleague from the early days in the La Trobe English Department, remembers slapstick-like instances of Clancy absentmindedness over details like lecture times and venues. But she also remembers this same colleague coming in to work early, tapping furiously at an old portable typewriter whence issued a steady stream of novels, stories, reviews and opinion pieces. Beneath the laconic exterior Laurie was a man of high ambition and high accomplishment. He published four novels, three volumes of short stories, four works of literary scholarship, a book length introduction to Australian culture, and a vast, as yet uncounted, number of literary reviews and occasional pieces. He was one of several important early La Trobe academics who won the University its enviable and ongoing reputation as a home for public intellectuals. Laurie was equally at ease publishing in refereed literary journals, the Bulletin and the Sun. Left-wing, always a touch home-spun, and a passionate Richmond supporter, he viewed the High Theory that permeated his academic domain of literary studies from the 1980s onwards with bemusement and even suspicion.Laurie made a lasting contribution to the La Trobe English Department (now Program). He played a major part in the introduction of courses in Australian literature in the early 1970s (a move spearheaded by John Barnes). In addition to a great deal of effective team teaching with colleagues on big undergraduate courses he designed and taught an innovative course in Contemporary Literature which continued, with revisions that reflected Laurie's wide reading in late twentieth century fiction, until he retired from La Trobe in 1994. Hugh Underhill, who sometimes took seminars in the course with Laurie, says: 'What stands out for me, indelibly still, are Laurie's easy friendliness towards and never-failing solicitude towards his students, his way with anecdote or an amusingly apt riposte, and his egalitarian no-nonsense manner with us all.' He was indeed immensely popular with students, some of whom became personal friends, and a thoroughly congenial colleague. Former Head of Department, David Rawlinson, recalls Laurie as 'having an influence for balance, openness and common sense in the Department, never single-mindedly of one line, always independent and his own man.' In a poem, 'Hospice Time,' written during Laurie's final weeks, Max Richards writes of meeting in a dream 'Laurie, my old colleague, / ambling, genial as ever, considerate.' A particular Clancy skill was specially honed for staffmeetings. When things became fractious Laurie would sit like a Buddha, apparently oblivious to the tensions in the room. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Association for the Study of Australian LiteratureSame topicCommonwealth, Australian Politics and FederalismFrench-language works237,207