MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1590935605

Nuevos datos acerca de la necrópolis romana del sector septentrional de Colonia Romula Hispalis

2004· article· es· W1590935605 on OpenAlexaff
Inmaculada Carrasco Gómez, Patricia Bachiller Burgos, Elisabet Conlin Hayes, David Doreste Franco, Elena Vera Cruz

Bibliographic record

VenueROMULA · 2004
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsAssociation des Radiologistes du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArchaeologyArtGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Durante la Intervencion Arqueologica de urgencia realizada en las Parcelas M-2 y M-3 de la calle Virgen del Carmen Doloroso, documentamos una necropolis de incineracion situada cronologicamente en el siglo I de nuestra era, necropolis que queda soterrada bajo niveles de habitacion del siglo II. Nuevamente durante el siglo IV, asistimos a la ocupacion del espacio con nuevos enterramientos, esta vez de inhumacion. -------------------------------------------------------------------- We present the combined results of the urgent excavation and construction survey taken place at the lots M-2 and M-3 on Virgen del Carmen Doloroso street. The stratigraphic sequence covers the different periods of use and occupation of this city lot, beginning at Roman times and continuing until today without interruption. The earliest evidence consists of 1st century AD incineration tombs. This funeral oreo is occupied in the 2nd century with domestic buildings. In the 4th century the lot recovered its use as a necropolis, as several late Roman burials were found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueROMULASame topicArchaeological and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207