MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1590983153

International Journal of Rule of Law, Transitional Justice and Human Rights

2010· article· en· W1590983153 on OpenAlexaff
Adnan Kadribašić, Caterina Bonora, Aleksandra Djordjevic, Lisa M.G. Nevens, Alina Măriuca Ionescu, Petra Komel, Irhad Strika, Ana Alibegova, Leila Mignonne Stehlik-Barry, Rose Beaugrand, Grażyna Baranowska, Sara Julia Grilc, Giulia Riccio, Mihail Stojanoski, Milos Bogicevic

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOmbudsman and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman rightsDemocracyTransitional justiceEconomic JusticePolitical scienceRule of lawWork (physics)LawAcademic freedomFreedom of expressionSociologyPublic administrationPublic relationsEngineeringHigher education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the freedom of opinion and expression have been values carefully nurtured by project’s partners, this International Journal represents a patchwork of different thematic discussions that have been initiated during the summer school. These young people, ISSS alumni whose works are being shared with you through the Journal, represent a new wave of thinkers set free from boundaries in their hunt for knowledge and intellectual challenges. They are current and future academics, policy makers, lawyers and teachers. The Association Pravnik is honored to have the opportunity to share their work and ideas with the wider public. In the years ahead we can only hope that International Summer School Sarajevo will host additional generations of alumni with the aim to promote democratic values and human rights across South East Europe and further afield.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.019
Scholarly communication0.0150.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicOmbudsman and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207