MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1591014746 · doi:10.4271/2005-01-0082

Analysis of the Increased Formability of Aluminum Alloy Sheet Formed Using Electromagnetic Forming

2005· article· en· W1591014746 on OpenAlexaff
J. Imbert, Michael J. Worswick, S. Winkler, Sergey F. Golovashchenko, Victor Dmitriev

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Forming Simulation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFord Motor Company
KeywordsFormabilityAlloyElectromagnetic formingMaterials scienceAluminiumMetallurgyEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the main challenges associated with the use of aluminum alloys in the automotive industry is increasing their limited formability. Electromagnetic forming has been considered recently as a way of addressing this issue. Increases in formability for several commercial aluminum alloys have been reported in electromagnetic (EM) and other high speed forming processes. These increases are typically attributed to high strain rate and inertial effects; however, these effects alone cannot account for the increases in formability observed. The present authors have previously reported that the increased formability is likely due to damage suppression caused by the tool/sheet interaction. This paper presents an analysis of this interaction and how it affects the formability of the sheet. Experimental and numerical work was carried out to determine the details of the forming process and its effects on formability, damage evolution and failure. It has been determined that when the sheet makes contact with the tool, it is subject to forces generated due to the impact, and very rapid bending and straightening. These combine to produce complex non-linear stress and strain histories. The predictions indicate that relatively little damage is generated in the process except in specific areas of the parts. Damage measurements agree with the predicted trends and fractographic analysis shows that parts formed with the EM process do not fail in pure ductile failure, but rather in a combination of plastic collapse, shear fracture and ductile failure. The majority of the plastic deformation occurs at impact, leading to strain rates in the order of 10,000 s-1. It is concluded that the rapid impact, bending and straightening that results from the tool/sheet interaction is the main cause of the increased formability observed in EM forming. The tool/sheet interaction produces a non-plane stress condition, very high strain rates and highly non-linear strain paths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicMetal Forming Simulation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207