MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Assessment and Treatment of Sex Offenders: A Handbook by A.R. Beech, L.A. Craig, and K.D. Browne(Eds.).

2010· article· en· W1591104936 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carla Reeves

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Howard Journal of Criminal Justice · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSex offenderPsychological interventionContext (archaeology)PsychologyCriminologyPerspective (graphical)SociologyPsychiatryHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chichester : Wiley-Blackwell ( 2009 ) 609pp. £34.99pb ISBN 978-0-470-01899-6 Written within the public protection and risk management approach, this edited text is a useful contribution to the literature on current and emerging methods in the clinical practice of classification, assessment and psychological treatment of sex offenders. The contributors are predominantly drawn from the UK, Canada and the USA, from a range of respected and experienced academics and practitioners. This allows the text to draw upon good practice and the experiences of pioneering work from across these jurisdictions. The Handbook is structured around four main sections: approaches to assessment; assessment with specific sex offender populations; interventions; and interventions with specific sex offender populations. Within this structure each chapter author describes their topic and considers both the research evidence and any contentious issues of significance. As, perhaps, to be expected, this work does not situate sex offenders within a broader social context. Rather, the paradigm adopted is the narrower clinical perspective of the individual pathology of the offender. As a consequence, there is no consideration of issues such as how sex offenders experience assessment and treatment or a critique on the theoretical basis of assessment. The last section of the book, however, moves away from the earlier structure on mechanisms, methods and effectiveness of assessment and treatment to include issues on what is termed ‘Policy and Practice’. This section focuses on the use of assessment or treatment interventions within non-clinical settings and the relationship of assessment to interventions other than treatment. The issues discussed are not often considered in this context and, thus, are a particularly interesting and unusual dimension to the book. However, on reading this section, it feels as though an opportunity to address this lack of earlier work has been missed. For example, the two chapters on police work and management of sex offenders through multi-agency public protection arrangements (MAPPA) are important areas in which the role and implications of assessment have been previously neglected in favour of describing the risk assessment system, but unfortunately the issues are not drawn out in depth here. The text has a number of strengths which distinguishes it from the rapidly growing corpus in this field. The most notable of these is the emphasis on applying the general techniques and concepts of assessment and treatment to specific sex offender populations. This includes groups that are often neglected such as female and juvenile sex offenders, as well as sex offenders with learning difficulties and/or mental health problems. A further strength is the discussion of the utility and evidenced efficacy on comparatively new measures used in England and Wales, such as the penile plethysmograph and polygraph. Such discussions are essential given current trends in penal policy and practice with sex offenders. For those practitioners, academics and students who are interested in the assessment and treatment of sex offenders this Handbook is a significant addition to the literature and should be placed within easy reach on the bookshelf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Howard Journal of Criminal JusticeSame topicPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingFrench-language works237,207