MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1591159342 · doi:10.1109/pedg.2015.7223102

Fast and efficient solar incremental conductance MPPT using lock-in amplifier

2015· article· en· W1591159342 on OpenAlexaff
Francisco Paz, Martin Ordonez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaximum power point trackingControl theory (sociology)Steady state (chemistry)Computer scienceAmplifierPhotovoltaic systemMaximum power principleTransient (computer programming)Noise (video)Controller (irrigation)SIGNAL (programming language)Electronic engineeringEngineeringVoltageInverterElectrical engineeringCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peak energy harvesting in Photovoltaic (PV) systems requires fast and effective Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) detection. Incremental Conductance (InCond) MPPT is one of the most popular detection methods, given its simple implementation and accuracy. In this paper, a new InCond technique is proposed based on small-signal identification and adaptive-step using a Lock-In Amplifier (LIA). The use of small-signal identification virtually eliminates the losses typically encountered in traditional large-signal MPPT perturbations. This feature improves the steady-state efficiency, while the LIA allows for robust and accurate measurement of the equivalent AC resistance to achieve maximum power extraction, even in the presence of noise. The proposed algorithm enables fast tracking during both static and changing environmental conditions, as well as smooth operation in steady-state. The proposed implementation reduces the adaptive-step InCond to a simple Discrete-Time Integral Controller, simplifying its analysis and configuration. Overall, the proposed implementation delivers superior results with similar hardware both during transients and in steady state. Simulations and experimental results are provided to validate the proposed implementation, and to illustrate its behavior in steady and transient operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207