MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1591167315 · doi:10.3917/inso.152.0082

Le travail social dans les quartiers « sensibles » : un rendez-vous manqué

2009· article· fr· W1591167315 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInformations sociales · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des Laurentides
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Les relations entre la politique de la ville et le travail social ont toujours été complexes, malgré une évidente proximité de leurs objectifs respectifs. Dès sa création et partant d’une critique des politiques sectorielles, la politique de la ville affirme l’approche territoriale comme mode de réponse à la complexité des questions sociales et s’appuie sur l’innovation dans les pratiques sociales pour transformer les politiques publiques de droit commun (politiques sociales, du logement, de l’éducatif, etc.). Pourtant, la rencontre entre ces deux politiques ne progresse que lentement : avec les « nouveaux acteurs » sociaux, les projets sociaux de territoire ou encore les projets de rénovation urbaine, la politique de la ville a du mal à mobiliser le droit commun des politiques sociales. Cette difficulté explique-t-elle aujourd’hui le retour vers une forme de culpabilisation des familles et de la pauvreté ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it