Le travail social dans les quartiers « sensibles » : un rendez-vous manqué
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Les relations entre la politique de la ville et le travail social ont toujours été complexes, malgré une évidente proximité de leurs objectifs respectifs. Dès sa création et partant d’une critique des politiques sectorielles, la politique de la ville affirme l’approche territoriale comme mode de réponse à la complexité des questions sociales et s’appuie sur l’innovation dans les pratiques sociales pour transformer les politiques publiques de droit commun (politiques sociales, du logement, de l’éducatif, etc.). Pourtant, la rencontre entre ces deux politiques ne progresse que lentement : avec les « nouveaux acteurs » sociaux, les projets sociaux de territoire ou encore les projets de rénovation urbaine, la politique de la ville a du mal à mobiliser le droit commun des politiques sociales. Cette difficulté explique-t-elle aujourd’hui le retour vers une forme de culpabilisation des familles et de la pauvreté ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".