MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1591203028 · doi:10.1093/fs/knl163

Renaud Camus érographe Renaud Camus érographe. By S <scp>jef</scp> H <scp>ouppermans</scp> . (Collection monographique Rodopi en littérature française contemporaine). Amsterdam — New York, Rodopi, 2004. 143 pp. Pb $39.00; €30.00.

2006· article· fr· W1591203028 on OpenAlexaff
Ralph Sarkonak

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Critical Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryArt historyArtHumanitiesLibrary scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Renaud Camus érographe Get access Renaud Camus érographe. By Sjef Houppermans. (Collection monographique Rodopi en littérature française contemporaine). Amsterdam — New York, Rodopi, 2004. 143 pp. Pb $39.00; €30.00. Ralph Sarkonak Ralph Sarkonak University of British Columbia Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar French Studies, Volume 60, Issue 4, OCTOBER 2006, Pages 552–553, https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/knl163 Published: 01 January 2006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicFrench Literature and Critical TheoryFrench-language works237,207