MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1591442400

A Daoist Perspective of Normative Media Practice: Profile Interview: Shelton Gunaratne, Minnesota State University Moorhead

2004· article· en· W1591442400 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eric Loo

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Online (University of Wollongong) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJournalismNormativeMedia studiesConventionSociologyState (computer science)Perspective (graphical)Mass mediaLawSocial sciencePolitical scienceArtVisual artsMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Humanocentric theory of communication? Eastern cosmological notion of yin-yang, Daoism and media responsibility? How is Eastern philosophy relevant to continual efforts in the academe to lift the standards of journalism? These questions are tackled in The Dao of the Press: A Humanocentric Theory, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2005. Eric Loo spoke with author and media academic Shelton Gunaratne at the Association of Education in Journalism and Mass Communication annual convention in Toronto in August 2004.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.014
Scholarly communication0.0080.014
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Online (University of Wollongong)Same topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207