Administration of PLP139–151 Primes T Cells Distinct from Those Spontaneously Responsive In Vitro to This Antigen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined the TCR repertoire used by naive SJL mice in their in vitro spontaneous response to proteolipid protein (PLP) 139-151 by Vbeta-Jbeta spectratyping and compared it to that used after immunization with the peptide. T cells from immunized mice use the public rearrangement Vbeta10-Jbeta1.1, but naive mice do not; in contrast, TCR CDR3-beta rearrangements of Vbeta18-Jbeta1.2 and Vbeta19-Jbeta1.2 consistently are associated with the spontaneous response. T cells involved in spontaneous and induced responses can each recognize PLP(139-151) presented in vivo, but its s.c. administration has different consequences for the two repertoires. Four days after immunization, T cells associated with spontaneous responsiveness appear in the draining lymph nodes but disappear by day 10 and never appear elsewhere. Simultaneously, Vbeta10-Jbeta1.1 T cells are likewise activated in the lymph nodes by day 4 and spread to the spleen by day 10. Eight- to 10-wk-old naive mice use a narrower repertoire of TCRs than do immunized age-matched mice. Induced Vbeta10-Jbeta1.1 T cells home to the CNS during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, whereas we failed to detect Vbeta18-Jbeta1.2 and Vbeta19-Jbeta1.2 TCR rearrangements in the CNS. Thus, we observe that administration of PLP(139-151) primes a T cell repertoire distinct from the one responsible for spontaneous responsiveness. This "immunized" repertoire substitutes for the naive one and becomes dominant at the time of disease onset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".