MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1591778030

On Ezra Pound's Aesthetic Identity With Classical Chinese Poetry

2015· article· en· W1591778030 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shuixiang Peng

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in literature and language · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPound (networking)PoetryViewpointsAestheticsIdeal (ethics)LiteratureChinese poetryArtPhilosophySociologyEpistemologyVisual artsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyzes and presents Ezra Pound’s ideal of aesthetic actualization in the process of creation and translation of poems, which is associated with his approach to Chinese classical poetry and culture. This article next shows how Chinese classical poetry meets Pound’s aesthetic pursuit in light of common elements in aesthetic creation and appreciation, particularly in his practicing Imagism. Finally, I have generalized three specific viewpoints: equation of human emotion, aesthetic images, and individual cultivation in Pound’s aesthetic identity with Chinese classical poetry, which gives rise to our vision of aesthetic realization as world-rooted, and so indicates further how it can serve as common grounds of transcending cultural barriers and individual discrepancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in literature and languageSame topicPoetry Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207