MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1591869022 · doi:10.4000/mimmoc.2085

Les Roms ou l’invention d’un peuple : dé-formation identitaire de la plus grande minorité d’Europe. L’exemple de l’Italie et de ses politiques ségrégationnistes

2015· article· fr· W1591869022 on OpenAlexaff
Sabira Kakouch

Bibliographic record

VenueMémoire(s) identité(s) marginalité(s) dans le monde occidental contemporain · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicRomani and Gypsy Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette communication propose une première partie consacrée à une analyse historique des mécanismes de construction identitaire (d’un point de vue social, économique et culturel) concernant les différents groupes roms présents sur le territoire italien depuis le XVIe siècle. La deuxième partie présente et analyse deux exemples de ségrégation mis en place par les politiques de logement et de scolarisation qui maintiennent les communautés roms en-dehors des espaces et des parcours urbains et scolaires « normaux », à savoir les camps et les classes séparées Lacio drom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMémoire(s) identité(s) marginalité(s) dans le monde occidental contemporainSame topicRomani and Gypsy StudiesFrench-language works237,207