MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1592064882 · doi:10.5772/18264

Composite Materials from Natural Resources: Recent Trends and Future Potentials

2011· book-chapter· en· W1592064882 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInTech eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialKenafSISALPolyethyleneCoirPolymerPolypropyleneFiber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Composites are combinations of two or more than two materials in which one of the materials, is reinforcing phase (fibres, sheets or particles) and the other is matrix phase (polymer, metal or ceramic). Composite materials are usually classified by type of reinforcement such as polymer composites, cement and metal-matrix composites (Chemical and Materials Engineering Department, home Page 2011; About.com, home page, 2011). Polymer matrix composites are mostly commercially produced composites in which resin is used as matrix with different reinforcing materials. Polymer (resin) is classified in two types thermoplastics (polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polystyrene (PS), polyolefin etc.) and thermosets (epoxy, polyester, and phenol-formaldehyde resin, etc.) which reinforces different type of fibre like natural (plant, animal, mineral) and man-made fibre for different application. In metal matrix composites, metal is one of important part of element and other part may be metal, ceramic or organic compounds. Cement matrix composites are made up of cement and with aggregate and basically used in building applications. Due to increase in population, natural resources are being exploited substantially as an alternative to synthetic materials. Due to this, the utilization of natural fibres for the reinforcement of the composites has received increasing attention. Natural fibres have many remarkable advantages over synthetic fibres. Nowadays, various types of natural fibres Natural fibres are largely divided into three categories depending on their origin: Mineral based, Plant based, and Animal based. In general, a mineral based composite is asbestos and is only a naturally occurring mineral fibre (silicate based mineral). In 2006, 2.3 million tones of asbestos were mined worldwide. Russia was the largest producer with about 40.2% world share followed by China (19.9%), Kazakhstan www.intechopen.com Advances in Composite Materials -Analysis of Natural and Man-Made Materials 122 (13.0%), Canada (10.3%), and Brazil (9.9%) (Wikipedia, home page, 2010). The main properties of asbestos fibres are their thermal, electrical, and sound insulation; inflammability; matrix reinforcement (cement, plastic, and resins), adsorption capacity, wear and friction properties (friction materials), brake linings and chemical inertness (except in acids). Asbestos fibres are often mixed with cement or woven into fabric or mats/ sheets (Britannica home page, 2011; Plant-based natural fibres are ligno-cellulosic in nature composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, whereas animal based fibres are of proteins, e.g., silk and wool. Natural fibre-reinforced polymer composites have attracted more and more research interests owing to their potential as an alternative for synthetic fibre composites such as glass or carbon fibre composites Natural fibre composites posses the advantages such as easy availability, renewability of raw materials, low cost, light weight and high specific strength, and stiffness. It is expected that in the near future biodegradable polymers will replace synthetic polymers, at least in some specific applications where a short life of the product will be more desirable. Natural polymers are considered suitable to replace synthetic ones in some specific applications where a long span life is not required. Natural fibre thermoplastic composites are relatively new family of composite materials. In such composites, a natural fibre/filler (such as kenaf fibre, wood fibre, hemp, sisal etc.) is mixed with a thermoplastic (e.g., polyethylene, polypropylene, PVC etc.) to produce the composite. In the last few years, thermoplastics as well as thermosetbased natural fibre composites (NFCs) have experienced a tremendous growth in the auto industry due to environmentally friendliness, renewability of these fibres, good sound abatement capability, and improved fuel efficiency resulted from the reduced weight of the components. These composite materials have received much commercial success in the semi-structural as well as structural applications. For example, interior parts such as door trim panels from natural fibre polypropylene (PP) and exterior parts such as engine and transmission covers from natural fibre-polyester resins are already in use in auto industry. Advantages of thermoplastic NFC over thermoset-based NFC include the greater design freedom as they are suitable for injection molding and extrusion processing in addition to the recycling possibilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it