MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1592064882 · doi:10.5772/18264

Composite Materials from Natural Resources: Recent Trends and Future Potentials

2011· book-chapter· en· W1592064882 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohini Saxena, Asokan Pappu, Anusha Sharma, Ruhi Haque, Sonal Wankhede

Bibliographic record

VenueInTech eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialKenafSISALPolyethyleneCoirPolymerPolypropyleneFiber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Composites are combinations of two or more than two materials in which one of the materials, is reinforcing phase (fibres, sheets or particles) and the other is matrix phase (polymer, metal or ceramic). Composite materials are usually classified by type of reinforcement such as polymer composites, cement and metal-matrix composites (Chemical and Materials Engineering Department, home Page 2011; About.com, home page, 2011). Polymer matrix composites are mostly commercially produced composites in which resin is used as matrix with different reinforcing materials. Polymer (resin) is classified in two types thermoplastics (polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polystyrene (PS), polyolefin etc.) and thermosets (epoxy, polyester, and phenol-formaldehyde resin, etc.) which reinforces different type of fibre like natural (plant, animal, mineral) and man-made fibre for different application. In metal matrix composites, metal is one of important part of element and other part may be metal, ceramic or organic compounds. Cement matrix composites are made up of cement and with aggregate and basically used in building applications. Due to increase in population, natural resources are being exploited substantially as an alternative to synthetic materials. Due to this, the utilization of natural fibres for the reinforcement of the composites has received increasing attention. Natural fibres have many remarkable advantages over synthetic fibres. Nowadays, various types of natural fibres Natural fibres are largely divided into three categories depending on their origin: Mineral based, Plant based, and Animal based. In general, a mineral based composite is asbestos and is only a naturally occurring mineral fibre (silicate based mineral). In 2006, 2.3 million tones of asbestos were mined worldwide. Russia was the largest producer with about 40.2% world share followed by China (19.9%), Kazakhstan www.intechopen.com Advances in Composite Materials -Analysis of Natural and Man-Made Materials 122 (13.0%), Canada (10.3%), and Brazil (9.9%) (Wikipedia, home page, 2010). The main properties of asbestos fibres are their thermal, electrical, and sound insulation; inflammability; matrix reinforcement (cement, plastic, and resins), adsorption capacity, wear and friction properties (friction materials), brake linings and chemical inertness (except in acids). Asbestos fibres are often mixed with cement or woven into fabric or mats/ sheets (Britannica home page, 2011; Plant-based natural fibres are ligno-cellulosic in nature composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, whereas animal based fibres are of proteins, e.g., silk and wool. Natural fibre-reinforced polymer composites have attracted more and more research interests owing to their potential as an alternative for synthetic fibre composites such as glass or carbon fibre composites Natural fibre composites posses the advantages such as easy availability, renewability of raw materials, low cost, light weight and high specific strength, and stiffness. It is expected that in the near future biodegradable polymers will replace synthetic polymers, at least in some specific applications where a short life of the product will be more desirable. Natural polymers are considered suitable to replace synthetic ones in some specific applications where a long span life is not required. Natural fibre thermoplastic composites are relatively new family of composite materials. In such composites, a natural fibre/filler (such as kenaf fibre, wood fibre, hemp, sisal etc.) is mixed with a thermoplastic (e.g., polyethylene, polypropylene, PVC etc.) to produce the composite. In the last few years, thermoplastics as well as thermosetbased natural fibre composites (NFCs) have experienced a tremendous growth in the auto industry due to environmentally friendliness, renewability of these fibres, good sound abatement capability, and improved fuel efficiency resulted from the reduced weight of the components. These composite materials have received much commercial success in the semi-structural as well as structural applications. For example, interior parts such as door trim panels from natural fibre polypropylene (PP) and exterior parts such as engine and transmission covers from natural fibre-polyester resins are already in use in auto industry. Advantages of thermoplastic NFC over thermoset-based NFC include the greater design freedom as they are suitable for injection molding and extrusion processing in addition to the recycling possibilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInTech eBooksSame topicNatural Fiber Reinforced CompositesFrench-language works237,207