Les jeunes et les villes : continuité et renouvellement des politiques locales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article a pour objectif, à partir d'une analyse historique et locale, de comprendre la façon dont se structurent les acteurs (au sens de responsables et de professionnels politiques, administratifs et associatifs) de jeunesse et la manière dont cette structuration influe sur l'implantation des politiques publiques en direction de cette population. À partir de la comparaison des initiatives conduites pour la jeunesse dans deux villes françaises depuis la fin du XIXe siècle, il s'agit de mesurer l'influence des habitudes de concertation entre décideurs, bénévoles et professionnels sur les types de politiques mis en œuvre. Sont étudiés à la fois l'ouverture plus ou moins grande des lieux de concertation, les rapports de force qui se nouent entre les différents types de participants, les modes d'appropriation des politiques nationales par ces acteurs publics et privés et l'élaboration des réponses locales aux questions de jeunesse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".