MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1592392443 · doi:10.7202/011245ar

Quand la biographie se « dramatise »

2005· article· fr· W1592392443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les six pièces retenues pour cet article mettent en scène des figures d’écrivains montrées sous divers angles biographiques : Gustave Flaubert, Emily Dickinson, Laure Conan, Léon Tolstoï, Jean-Paul Sartre et Eugene O’Neill y deviennent des personnages qui rejouent un aspect ou l’autre de leur vie et de leur oeuvre. Sollicitant à la fois le factuel et l’imaginaire, ces productions déploient le matériau biographique à la faveur de transpositions stylistiques, génériques, temporelles, géographiques qui, loin de reconduire le mythe, convient plutôt à sa relecture. Si les tonalités peuvent varier — de la poétisation à la parodie, de la fantaisie à l’appropriation autobiographique, du festif au tragique —, la forme théâtrale est toujours garante d’une actualisation, et c’est là sa spécificité en regard d’autres biographies littéraires, qui donne à voir, au présent, la réalité et son interprétation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it