MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1592473146

“From a Distance it Looks Like Peace”: Reading Beneath the Fascist Style of Gilead in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale

2007· article· en· W1592473146 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Angela Laflen

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Canadian Literature · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStyle (visual arts)IdeologyReading (process)AestheticsVisual cultureHistoryLiteratureVisual artsSociologyArtPhilosophyLawPoliticsLinguisticsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Margaret Atwood’s novel The Handmaid’s Tale reveals the danger of using visual culture to create what Rey Chow calls a “glossy surface image” that oversimplifies complex ideologies and social relationships. Atwood suggests that individuals can resist visual manipulation by learning to “read beneath” images. Commentators on fascism and its use of the visual image, such as Walter Benjamin and Chow, note that people’s receptivity to visual culture makes it the perfect vehicle for propaganda, a view substantiated by Nazi Germany and Atwood’s fictional community, Gilead. In the novel, “fascist style” is associated with the eliding and/or reshaping of history, accomplished through the editing of visual scenes. The Commanders of Gilead orchestrate visual tableaux, such as a display of corpses on the Wall, in order to regulate the eyes and minds of lower social orders. More generally, Atwood uses notional ekphrasis to interrogate Gilead’s treatment of women, an exploration focalized through her protagonist, Offred.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Canadian LiteratureSame topicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionFrench-language works237,207