MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1592498941

Overview of COMET software

2000· article· en· W1592498941 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S. T. Raveendra

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCometFinite element methodVibrationBoundary element methodSoftwareHolographyBoundary (topology)Boundary value problemAcousticsComputer scienceStructural engineeringPhysicsEngineeringMathematicsOpticsMathematical analysisAstronomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COMET, a computational simulation tool based on finite element and boundary element methods, was developed to model sound propagation in fluid, structural and elastic porous domains. The tool contains a graphical user interface (GUI) called COMET/Vision and a family of solvers grouped under COMET/Acoustics. The uncoupled boundary element analysis (BEA) module of COMET considers the effect of vibration on the sound field and assumed negligible effect of sound field on vibrations. Various other modules such as coupled BEA, uncoupled finite element analysis (FEA), statistical acoustic foam engineering (SAFE) and generalized nearfield acoustical holography (NAH) are discussed with respect to COMET software.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207