Pour la plasticité du FLE : Enseignement et art contemporain
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé : Bien que présent en classe de langue, l’art moderne y est souvent abordé d’une manière tendancieuse et superficielle et - comme tant d’autres contenus des méthodes - fait le lit de la doxa (au sens que Roland Barthes donnait à ce terme). En revanche, utiliser l’art conformément à son esprit permet de dégager et de contrebalancer le coté cliché des manuels. Des activités inspirées par les pratiques artistiques permettent de rentabiliser, égayer et personnaliser l’enseignement/apprentissage du FLE. 
 
 Abstract : Modern art - although present in teaching - is often used in a tendentious and superficial manner and thus comforts the doxa. On the contrary, if used adequately, modern art pinpoints and counterbalances the cliché so present in language methods. We propose activities that make teaching and learning more efficient, pleasant and authentic.
 
 Mots clés : art moderne, doxa, créativité, plasticité, motivation
 
 Key words : modern art, doxa, creativity, plasticity, motivation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it