La sociologie économique de Thorstein Veblen ; pertinences et impertinences d’une pensée à contre-courant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thorstein Veblen a su développer une analyse rigoureuse et originale de la société américaine au début du XXe siècle. L’analyse véblénienne tient son originalité du regard d’étranger que pose l’auteur sur sa société ainsi que sur les sources intellectuelles diverses où il a puisé ses influences. Après avoir présenté en quoi le regard de Veblen sur le capitalisme sauvage diffère radicalement des autres auteurs de son époque, nous identifions les principales sources intellectuelles de sa pensée, soit la philosophie kantienne, le pragmatisme, l’École historique allemande, les théories évolutionnistes et le socialisme. Nous montrons ensuite comment ces influences lui ont permis de développer une théorie de l’évolution des institutions économiques, à bien des égards supérieures aux théories néo-institutionnalistes contemporaines, lui permettant de critiquer radicalement une Amérique dominée des institutions « imbéciles ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".