MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1593004325 · doi:10.2451/2011pm0005

Elbaite-liddicoatite from Black Rapids glacier, Alaska

2011· article· it· W1593004325 on OpenAlex
Aaron J. Lussier, F. C. Hawthorne, Vladimir K. Michaelis, Pedro M. Aguiar, Scott Kroeker

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePeriodico di mineralogia · 2011
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourmalineMagic angle spinningCrystallographyEMPAElectron microprobeMineralogyChemistryGeologyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)StereochemistryGeochemistryNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Periodico di Mineralogia (2011), 80, 1 (Special Issue), 57-73 - DOI: 10.2451/2011PM0005 Special Issue in memory of Sergio Lucchesi Elbaite-liddicoatite from Black Rapids glacier, Alaska Aaron J. Lussier 1 , Frank C. Hawthorne 1,* , Vladimir K. Michaelis 2 , Pedro M. Aguiar 2 and Scott Kroeker 2 1 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada 2 Department of Chemistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada *Corresponding author: frank_hawthorne@umanitoba.ca Abstract Liddicoatite, ideally Ca(AlLi 2 )Al 6 (SiO 6 )(BO 3 ) 3 (OH) 3 F, is an extremely rare species of tourmaline, found in very few localities worldwide. A large (~ 2 cm in cross section), euhedral sample of tourmaline retrieved from atop the Black Rapids glacier, Alaska, is shown to vary from a light pink elbaite in the core region, average composition (Na 0.4 Ca 0.3□0.3 )(Al 1.75 Li 1.25 ) Al 6 (BO 3 ) 3 (Si 6 O 18 )F 0.4 (OH) 3.6 , to a pale green liddicoatite at the edge of the crystal, (Na 0.3 Ca 0.6 □ 0.1 )(Al 1.0 Li 1.6 Fe 0.2 Mn 0.2 )Al 6 (BO 3 ) 3 (Si 6 O 18 )F 1.0 (OH) 3.0 . Detailed electron-microprobe analysis and 11 B and 27 Al Magic-Angle-Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy show that several substitutions were active during growth, with X □ + Y Al → X Ca + Y Li (liddicoatite-rossmanite solid-solution) and 2 Y Al + X □ → 2 Y M* + X Ca accounting for most of the compositional variation. Throughout the tourmaline, there are instances of reversals in the trends of all major constituents, although few compositional gaps are observed. Most notably, a sharp decline in Ca content from ~ 0.35 to ~ 0.05 apfu (atoms per formula unit) with increasing distance from the core at ~ 2 mm from the crystal edge is followed by a sharp rise in Ca content (to 0.55 apfu), along with (Fe + Mn) content (from 0.01 to 0.35 apfu). In the core region, the origin of the Ca in the tourmaline is not clear; the correlation of Ca and F is consistent with both (1) a melt in which Ca was held as complexes with F, or (2) earlier contamination of the melt by a (Ca, F)-rich fluid. Close to the rim, a dramatic increase in Ca, F, Mn and Fe is probably due to late-stage contamination by fluids that have removed these components from adjacent wallrocks. Key words: liddicoatite; elbaite; tourmaline; late-stage Ca enrichment; pegmatite; zoning; electron-microprobe analysis; Black Rapids glacier, Alaska; 11 B MAS NMR; 27 Al MAS NMR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it