MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1593178207

From Mandarin Silk Ciselé Velvet to Navy Blue Wool Gabardine: Three Centuries of Men's Fashion at the McCord Museum

2002· article· en· W1593178207 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicolas ChampRoux

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielle · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFashion and Cultural Textiles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClothingExhibitionArtHollywoodArt historyTheme (computing)Visual artsVisitor patternWhite (mutation)PaintingHistoryComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From 17 May 2002 until 5 January 2003, the McCord Museum in Montreal presented Clothes Make the MAN, an exhibition of selected men's fashions over the last three hundred years. Guest curator Gail Cariou and Cynthia Cooper, McCord's Curator of Costume and Textiles, along with Curatorial Assistant Eileen Stack, chose a nonchronological approach to the interaction between men and fashion, focusing instead on eight key themes. The ensemble was set in a dimly lit environment, whose walls were painted a dark steel blue. A few sensors activated soundtracks related to the displayed theme. Finally, the clothes on display were equipped with detectors that prevented viewers from behaving as if they were visiting a shopping mall, a detail that seems to have annoyed a few, at least if we are to believe the comments in the visitors book. Upon entering the exhibit, the visitor was welcomed by a simple display showing, side by side, an eighteenthand a twentieth-century three-piece suit. The introductory text suggested a comparison of menswear with women's fashion, the latter a domain that has generally been more broadly acknowledged in museum exhibitions. This approach asserts that men's clothing, like women's, has been and continues to be a means of personal display and self-identification, and that it has its own set of unwritten rules. That is, men's clothes, too, have evolved according to changing cultural, economic and political environments. This comparative explanation attempts to validate the study of men's fashion as a relevant signifier of the time from which it emanates. The two suits introduce useful parameters, while acting as an interesting microcosm encapsulating the eight topics addressed through the show. The first of these is a 1750s mandarin silk cisele velvet suit that belonged to French surgeon and doctor Louis Francois Badelart (1728-1802) who had worn it as an immigrant when he immigrated to Quebec City in 1757. Next to it, the twentieth-century suit belonged to former Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau. Sewn for the politician by Cosmo Spina, his personal tailor between 1980 and 1984, this 1980 navy blue wool gabardine pinstripe suit is striking in its seeming simplicity and anonymity. These two garments immediately give rise to one problematic aspect of the exhibition, that of the society represented by the available garments, a problem made even more obvious in the very first theme of the show, Masculinity — The Clothes Make the Ideal Man. The curators chose to fit three centuries of men's fashion into a linear display of six mannequins, unequally dressed yet judiciously. accompanied by engravings of men similarly attired according to the fashion of the time. Although quite elegant, this display sustained a discourse that might be contradictory to the premise of the show. After having proposed that menswear was subjected to the same rules as women's, that of subtle transformations and whimsical renewal, the first section of the show boldly compacted three centuries of fashion into six displays. A more specific slice of history, with a more subtle observation of the changes occurring from one decade to another, might have better convinced the visitor. Moreover, the point remains that we were looking in this section at a very specific social stratum, the well-to-do. Is the notion of an ideal man

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielleSame topicFashion and Cultural TextilesFrench-language works237,207