MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1593276654 · doi:10.1080/01431161.2014.887236

Georeferencing of UK DMC stereo-images without ground control points by exploiting geometric distortions

2014· article· en· W1593276654 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Remote Sensing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of SurreyEuropean Space Agency
KeywordsGeoreferenceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceStereo imageRemote sensingComputer graphics (images)Image (mathematics)GeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes a new method for the georeferencing of UK-DMC imagery that does not require ground control points (GCPs). The proposed method utilizes satellite ancillary data, and the inter-imager offsets to determine the geolocation of individual pixels. The major step involved is the direct georeferencing of each pixel using satellite GPS and attitude sensor observations. The known separation between the sensors will allow us to determine the geolocations of all pixels that are taken at the same time using the same exterior orientation parameters. Traditional methods for georeferencing use GCPs, which are expensive and time-consuming tasks. Moreover, the traditional method is not suitable for a pushbroom imager because every scan line has a different set of exterior orientation parameters. Therefore, we propose a direct georeferencing approach without GCPs. The major source of error in direct georeferencing is the error in attitude measurements. The reason for this error is considered to be the thermo-elastic effects on the satellite, which affect the sensors’ positioning, causing deformation in the images. These effects have been modelled as a transformation matrix that describes the extent of deformation in the imagery, and is estimated by exploiting the geometric distortions in stereo Earth images. For this purpose, a mathematical model has been developed to demonstrate how inter-image offsets have been introduced into the imagery and affected by thermal deformation. The mathematical model is based on the sensor configuration of UK-DMC satellites. The model has been further inverted to extract the thermal deformation at a given row and column offset. The thermal deformation matrix has been found to mitigate the pointing error up to 1 km. The accuracy of the thermal deformation estimates is highly dependent on the accuracy of image offsets. The accuracy of image offsets is dependent on several factors, which include the image registration method, window size, along-track separation between the sensors, satellite attitude, and resolution of the sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it