Représentations des connaissances scientifiques par des gestionnaires de la gestion intégrée au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 2002, le gouvernement du Québec a instauré la Politique nationale de l’eau, qui consacre la gestion intégrée de l’eau par bassin versant (GIEBV) comme le mode de gestion le plus approprié. L’étude se concentre sur la représentation des connaissances scientifiques dans la GIEBV. Dix-huit administrateurs ont été interrogés sur leur perception de cette gestion et du rôle qu’y jouent les connaissances scientifiques. Il ressort de cette étude toute l’importance des connaissances scientifiques dans les prises de décision, en comparaison des connaissances traditionnelles, ainsi que le rôle de certains administrateurs dans l’explication des connaissances scientifiques aux autres. Les gestionnaires ont soulevé plusieurs problèmes comme le manque de financement, le manque de connaissances scientifiques disponibles et le manque de pouvoir pour agir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".