DAILY HEMODIALYSIS—SELECTED TOPICS: Cardiovascular Effects of Frequent Intensive Hemodialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Frequent intensive hemodialysis (short daily hemodialysis [2 hours per session, six sessions per week] and nocturnal home hemodialysis [6 hours per session, five to six sessions per week]) has recently gained increasing popularity as an alternative to conventional hemodialysis (4 hours per session, three sessions per week). There is an emerging body of evidence that frequent intensive hemodialysis offers superior uremic toxin clearance, blood pressure control, and other cardiovascular outcomes. The goals of the present review are to systematically evaluate the available evidence in blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes in ESRD and the achievable changes after converting from conventional dialysis to frequent intensive hemodialysis, and to provide possible physiological explanations to account for these important changes of potent markers of adverse events in this patient population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".