Thémis et la psyché : les spécialistes de la psychiatrie et de la psychologie à la cour des jeunes délinquants de Montréal, 1912-1950
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’étude des rapports fournis à la cour des jeunes délinquants de Montréal entre 1912 et 1950 par les psychiatres et psychologues révèle une pénétration graduelle, constante et croissante des spécialistes de la psyché. La présence des rapports s’accroît surtout à compter des années trente et s’amplifie dans les années quarante. Aux médecins aliénistes des premières années qui produisent des rapports laconiques succèdent des psychiatres et, surtout, des psychologues, dont les rapports nettement plus étoffés mettent les acteurs judiciaires en contact plus étroit avec une lecture psychologique de la situation des mineurs. Il n’apparaît pas excessif de conclure que, avec le temps, la présence des professionnels de la psyché a contribué à “psychologiser” l’approche des acteurs de la cour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".