MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1593863998 · doi:10.1109/spawc.2015.7227108

Analog coding for Gaussian source and state interference estimation

2015· article· en· W1593863998 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Abou Saleh, Fady Alajaji, Wai-Yip Chan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpper and lower boundsComputer scienceAlgorithmTransmitterGaussianEncoderParametric statisticsDecoding methodsLinear network codingChannel (broadcasting)MathematicsMathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider zero-delay analog coding of a Gaussian source over a Gaussian channel with additive correlated Gaussian interference known to the transmitter. The receiver aims to jointly estimate the source signal and the state interference. We propose a layered parametric analog coding scheme based on linear and sawtooth mappings. We derive an upper bound on the distortion for the parametric scheme by assuming a suboptimal decoder. To optimize the system parameters, we use two suboptimal methods. The first one is partially numerical and part of the parameters are derived assuming no sawtooth mapping; the other one, however, is based on minimizing the derived upper bound. To improve the performance whenever storage and offline design complexity are not an issue, we design a nonparametric mapping through an iterative process based on joint optimization between the encoder and the decoder using the necessary conditions for optimality. Numerical results show that the nonparametric and parametric mappings outperform the linear scheme and overcome the saturation effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207