MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1594022061

Wordsworth in American Literary Culture (review)

2010· article· en· W1594022061 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew M. Stauffer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Byron Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryRomanceHistoryLiteratureAmerican literatureLyricsAmerican poetryHistory of literatureSubject (documents)RomanticismLiterary criticismCulture of the United StatesArt historyArtClassics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WORDSWORTH IN AMERICAN LITERARY CULTURE. Edited by Joel Pace and Matthew Scott. Foreword by Stephen Gill. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Pp. xix + 248. ISBN 1 4039 0133 3. $95. This volume of essays on the subject of Wordsworth's influence on American literature is a welcome addition to the growing field of transatlantic Romantic Studies. As Meredith McGill has noted, the so-called 'traffic in poems' between Great Britain and the United States in the nineteenth century fostered a symbiosis of literary cultures. Poetry by British writers such as Wordsworth, Byron and Hemans circulated widely, especially on the eastern seaboard from Maine to Virginia, with Philadelphia, New York and Boston producing the majority of editions. American periodicals were even more important to the transmission of British Romantic poetry, as they rapidly and frequently reprinted poems, especially lyrics. Influence flowed in the other direction as well, of course, but the volume under review is concentrated on the migration and adaptation of Wordsworth - his poetry, his biography, his ethics, his perspectives - by a variety of American authors working throughout the nineteenth century. As such, the volume provides an interesting set of data points through which a larger story of Wordsworth's American reception may be mapped. It also presents future researchers with many useful points of departure. The book's editors, Joel Pace and Matthew Scott, set out the terms of engagement in their introduction: 'the influence of Wordsworth's writing on American writers', not solely in literary terms but as a broader cultural influence. Thus the volume attends to Wordsworth's impact 'in environmental studies as well as the history of radical politics, religion, education, and publishing'. Pace and Scott and their gathered contributors are interested in the American culture industry, probed in the work of specific writers, as constituting a Wordsworth for the nineteenth-century reading public. As the introduction claims (perhaps a bit too broadly): 'the human themes to which [Wordsworth] addresses himself as a writer are themselves universals that have become embedded in American cultural consciousness'. The essays that follow on from this claim attempt to make good on this vision of a Wordsworthian literary history of American culture. As individual contributions each has valuable points to make, while the overarching narrative is more suggested than pursued in detail. Susan Manning's essay offers a thoughtful introduction to the methodological questions of transatlantic influence studies, focusing on 'literary style' as ideological marker, with metaphor and translation as key modes of 'thinking across' that such studies might engage with. In such modes, the traditional hierarchical arrangement of influence (in which precedence determines authority) gives way to a more synchronic awareness of similarity and transmission. Other contributors focus on particular instances of the Wordsworthian in American letters. Richard Gravil attends to the movement of Cooper's Natty Bumppo towards an alignment with Wordsworth's view of nature. Similarly, Bruce Graver examines Whittier's pursuit of the American picturesque and Native American culture, using Wordsworth as a model. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Byron JournalSame topicPoetry Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207