MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1594022061

Wordsworth in American Literary Culture (review)

2010· article· en· W1594022061 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Byron Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryRomanceHistoryLiteratureAmerican literatureLyricsAmerican poetryHistory of literatureSubject (documents)RomanticismLiterary criticismCulture of the United StatesArt historyArtClassics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WORDSWORTH IN AMERICAN LITERARY CULTURE. Edited by Joel Pace and Matthew Scott. Foreword by Stephen Gill. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Pp. xix + 248. ISBN 1 4039 0133 3. $95. This volume of essays on the subject of Wordsworth's influence on American literature is a welcome addition to the growing field of transatlantic Romantic Studies. As Meredith McGill has noted, the so-called 'traffic in poems' between Great Britain and the United States in the nineteenth century fostered a symbiosis of literary cultures. Poetry by British writers such as Wordsworth, Byron and Hemans circulated widely, especially on the eastern seaboard from Maine to Virginia, with Philadelphia, New York and Boston producing the majority of editions. American periodicals were even more important to the transmission of British Romantic poetry, as they rapidly and frequently reprinted poems, especially lyrics. Influence flowed in the other direction as well, of course, but the volume under review is concentrated on the migration and adaptation of Wordsworth - his poetry, his biography, his ethics, his perspectives - by a variety of American authors working throughout the nineteenth century. As such, the volume provides an interesting set of data points through which a larger story of Wordsworth's American reception may be mapped. It also presents future researchers with many useful points of departure. The book's editors, Joel Pace and Matthew Scott, set out the terms of engagement in their introduction: 'the influence of Wordsworth's writing on American writers', not solely in literary terms but as a broader cultural influence. Thus the volume attends to Wordsworth's impact 'in environmental studies as well as the history of radical politics, religion, education, and publishing'. Pace and Scott and their gathered contributors are interested in the American culture industry, probed in the work of specific writers, as constituting a Wordsworth for the nineteenth-century reading public. As the introduction claims (perhaps a bit too broadly): 'the human themes to which [Wordsworth] addresses himself as a writer are themselves universals that have become embedded in American cultural consciousness'. The essays that follow on from this claim attempt to make good on this vision of a Wordsworthian literary history of American culture. As individual contributions each has valuable points to make, while the overarching narrative is more suggested than pursued in detail. Susan Manning's essay offers a thoughtful introduction to the methodological questions of transatlantic influence studies, focusing on 'literary style' as ideological marker, with metaphor and translation as key modes of 'thinking across' that such studies might engage with. In such modes, the traditional hierarchical arrangement of influence (in which precedence determines authority) gives way to a more synchronic awareness of similarity and transmission. Other contributors focus on particular instances of the Wordsworthian in American letters. Richard Gravil attends to the movement of Cooper's Natty Bumppo towards an alignment with Wordsworth's view of nature. Similarly, Bruce Graver examines Whittier's pursuit of the American picturesque and Native American culture, using Wordsworth as a model. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it