Wordsworth in American Literary Culture (review)
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
WORDSWORTH IN AMERICAN LITERARY CULTURE. Edited by Joel Pace and Matthew Scott. Foreword by Stephen Gill. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Pp. xix + 248. ISBN 1 4039 0133 3. $95. This volume of essays on the subject of Wordsworth's influence on American literature is a welcome addition to the growing field of transatlantic Romantic Studies. As Meredith McGill has noted, the so-called 'traffic in poems' between Great Britain and the United States in the nineteenth century fostered a symbiosis of literary cultures. Poetry by British writers such as Wordsworth, Byron and Hemans circulated widely, especially on the eastern seaboard from Maine to Virginia, with Philadelphia, New York and Boston producing the majority of editions. American periodicals were even more important to the transmission of British Romantic poetry, as they rapidly and frequently reprinted poems, especially lyrics. Influence flowed in the other direction as well, of course, but the volume under review is concentrated on the migration and adaptation of Wordsworth - his poetry, his biography, his ethics, his perspectives - by a variety of American authors working throughout the nineteenth century. As such, the volume provides an interesting set of data points through which a larger story of Wordsworth's American reception may be mapped. It also presents future researchers with many useful points of departure. The book's editors, Joel Pace and Matthew Scott, set out the terms of engagement in their introduction: 'the influence of Wordsworth's writing on American writers', not solely in literary terms but as a broader cultural influence. Thus the volume attends to Wordsworth's impact 'in environmental studies as well as the history of radical politics, religion, education, and publishing'. Pace and Scott and their gathered contributors are interested in the American culture industry, probed in the work of specific writers, as constituting a Wordsworth for the nineteenth-century reading public. As the introduction claims (perhaps a bit too broadly): 'the human themes to which [Wordsworth] addresses himself as a writer are themselves universals that have become embedded in American cultural consciousness'. The essays that follow on from this claim attempt to make good on this vision of a Wordsworthian literary history of American culture. As individual contributions each has valuable points to make, while the overarching narrative is more suggested than pursued in detail. Susan Manning's essay offers a thoughtful introduction to the methodological questions of transatlantic influence studies, focusing on 'literary style' as ideological marker, with metaphor and translation as key modes of 'thinking across' that such studies might engage with. In such modes, the traditional hierarchical arrangement of influence (in which precedence determines authority) gives way to a more synchronic awareness of similarity and transmission. Other contributors focus on particular instances of the Wordsworthian in American letters. Richard Gravil attends to the movement of Cooper's Natty Bumppo towards an alignment with Wordsworth's view of nature. Similarly, Bruce Graver examines Whittier's pursuit of the American picturesque and Native American culture, using Wordsworth as a model. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle