Contrainte et capital : le rapport mitigé au marxisme de la sociologie historique de Charles Tilly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quel rapport la sociologie historique de Charles Tilly, telle que développée notamment dans ses travaux sur la formation des États nationaux européens et les grandes révolutions, entretient-elle à la sociologie historique néomarxiste et plus généralement au marxisme ? Cet article se propose d’évaluer ce rapport à partir d’une analyse de trois des plus importants travaux de Tilly en sociologie historique, soit La Vendée, publié en 1964, Les révolutions européennes 1492-1992, publié en 1993, puis Contrainte et capital dans la formation de l’Europe 990-1990, publié en 1992. Sa thèse principale est que ce rapport existe mais se distingue par son caractère mitigé. Il y est soutenu que Tilly doit plutôt être classé du côté des auteurs néowébériens, l’héritage du marxisme étant assumé mais résolument intégré au sein d’études toujours multicausales de ces grandes transformations sociopolitiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".