CASUÍSTICA ONCOLÓGICA EN CANINOS DEL LABORATORIO DE PATOLOGÍA VETERINARIA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE NARIÑO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En los ultimos anos, se ha incrementado la prevalencia e incidencia de cancer en animales pequenos, debido en parte, a un aumento en la poblacion de mascotas y a su vez, al mayor contacto de estas con factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de esta enfermedad, hasta constituirse en una de las principales causas de muerte. Por lo tanto, es importante determinar el comportamiento epidemiologico de esta patologia. El objetivo del presente estudio fue determinar la casuistica de neoplasias de caninos remitidas al Laboratorio de Patologia Veterinaria de la Universidad de Narino, en el periodo comprendido entre el ano 2007 y el ano 2012. Para lograr este objetivo, se realizo un estudio descriptivo de tipo cualitativo en el area de catedra y servicio de patologia del programa de Medicina Veterinaria de la Universidad de Narino en el municipio de Pasto, Colombia. Se recolecto informacion de los casos a partir de los reportes de las biopsias remitidas entre los anos 2007 y 2012. Durante los anos evaluados se presentaron un total de 207 casos; el 54,1% de los tumores se presentaron en hembras y el 45,9% en machos, de los cuales, el 54,1% fueron tumores malignos, el 36,3% tumores benignos y en el 9,6% no fue posible determinar el comportamiento. La edad promedio de presentacion de las neoplasias fue de 7,9 ± 3,2 anos, dentro de los cuales el 69,1% eran perros viejos, el 23,7% adultos y el 7,2% animales jovenes. Las razas mas afectadas fueron Caniche, Labrador, Boxer y perros Mestizos. Las neoplasias de mayor presentacion fueron tumores malignos (28,5%), derivados de celulas epiteliales de diferente localizacion anatomica, seguido de tumores de celulas redondas como mastocitomas (9,2%) y tumores venereos transmisibles. El estudio permitio establecer el comportamiento epidemiologico y las caracteristicas de casuistica oncologica presentada en el Laboratorio durante el periodo del estudio. Palabras claves: perro, histopatologia, tumores CANINE ONCOLOGICAL CASUISTRY IN VETERINARY PATOLOGY LABORATORY OF NARINO UNIVERSITY ABSTRACT In recent years, the prevalence and incidence of cancer in small animals has been increased, due, in part, to a rise in the population of pets, and in turn, the greater exposure of this population with risk factors for the development of this disease to become one of the major causes of death. Therefore, it is important to determine the epidemic behavior of this pathology. The objective of the present study was to determine the neoplasia casuistry of canines remitted to the Laboratory of Veterinary Pathology, University of Narino, during the period from 2007 to 2012. This objective was accomplished through a descriptive study of qualitative type in the class area and the Pathology Service in the Program of Veterinary Medicine, University of Narino, in the municipality of Pasto – Colombia. Information of the cases was gathered from reports of biopsies remitted between the years 2007 and 2012. During the evaluated years, 207 cases were presented; 54.1% of the tumors occurred in females and 45.9% in males, from which, 51.7% was malignant tumors, 36.2% benign tumors and in the 12.1%, it was not possible to determine the behavior. The average age of neoplasia occurrence was 7.9±3.2 years old within which 69.1% was old dogs, 23.7% adults and 7.2 young animals. The most affected breeds were Caniche, Labrador, Boxer and Crossbreed dogs. The neoplasms of the greatest incidence were malignant tumors (28.5%) derived from epithelial cells of different anatomical localization, followed by tumors of round cells like mastocitomas (9.2%), and transferable venereal tumors (8.7%). The study revealed the epidemic behavior and the characteristics of the oncological casuistry presented in the laboratory during the period of the study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".