Probing the role of AMPAR endocytosis and long‐term depression in behavioural sensitization: relevance to treatment of brain disorders, including drug addiction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modifying the function of postsynaptic alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid subtype glutamate receptors (AMPARs) is one of the most important mechanisms by which the efficacy of synaptic transmission at excitatory glutamatergic synapses in the mammalian brain is regulated. Traditionally these types of modifications have been thought to be achieved mainly by altering the channel gating properties or conductance of the receptors. A large body of evidence accumulated from recent studies strongly suggests that AMPARs, like most integral plasma membrane proteins, are continuously recycled between the plasma membrane and the intracellular compartments via vesicle-mediated plasma membrane insertion and clathrin-dependent endocytosis. Regulation of either receptor insertion or endocytosis results in a rapid change in the number of these receptors expressed on the plasma membrane surface and in the receptor-mediated responses, thereby playing an important role in mediating certain forms of synaptic plasticity, such as long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD). These studies have significantly advanced our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying LTP and LTD, and their potential contributions to learning and memory-related behaviours. Here I provide a brief summary of the current state of knowledge concerning clathrin-mediated AMPAR endocytosis and its relationship to the expression of certain forms of LTD in several brain areas. The potential impact of recent advancements on our efforts to probe the roles of synaptic plasticity in learning and memory-related behaviours, and their relevance to some brain disorders, particularly drug addiction, are also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".