Rapprochement entre curriculum, savoirs savants et pratiques enseignantes en enseignement de l’histoire : l’influence de l’épistémologie pratique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les pratiques enseignantes sont décrites par les recherches comme stables et persistantes, en dépit d’injonctions curriculaires renouvelées. Dans le contexte de l’implantation d’un nouveau programme d’Histoire et éducation à la citoyenneté, où les finalités normatives découlent d’un changement de paradigme épistémologique, quelles influences l’épistémologie personnelle et les finalités des enseignants québécois de cette discipline au secondaire peuvent-elles avoir sur la relation entre leurs pratiques enseignantes et les finalités prescrites par le programme ? Une étude multicas a permis de dégager les patterns communs aux pratiques de sept de ces enseignants, ainsi que les facteurs médiateurs des relations qu’elles entretiennent avec le curriculum et certains éléments culturels professionnels et sociaux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".