Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude explore les réactions de deux populations adolescentes, un âge décisif pour le développement des attitudes intergroupes, quant au pluralisme culturel et religieux qui caractérise leurs sociétés. Il s’agit de comparer les attitudes de deux groupes de lycéens, l’un en contexte d’immigration récente, en Italie, et l’autre en contexte de longue expérience d’immigration, en France. Les hypothèses de la recherche, fondée sur une démarche quantitative, prévoient que les différences de contexte – l’historicité de l’immigration et le rôle de la culture politique nationale sur la manière de gérer le phénomène – représentent les principales sources de variation des stéréotypes et des attitudes envers l’immigration. La prise en compte de ces deux variables permettra de comprendre pourquoi les jeunes Italiens expriment un préjugé à caractère socioéconomique alors que les jeunes Français expriment un préjugé à caractère identitaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".