MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1594604965 · doi:10.1353/lac.0.0056

Communicating Community: Russian and Canadian Mennonite Correspondence, 1850–1900

2009· article· en· W1594604965 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rachel Joanne Mills

Bibliographic record

VenueLibraries & the Cultural Record · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaContext (archaeology)NarrativePeriod (music)HistorySense of communitySociologyGenealogyGender studiesSocial scienceAestheticsLiteratureArchaeologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journals and diaries have been recognized as tools used by individuals and communities to sustain narratives, make sense of life events, and strengthen community. Correspondence created in nineteenth-century Russian and Canadian Mennonite communities was used for these same purposes. Mennonites wrote letters to transplant and strengthen community beliefs and values across a growing diaspora. Their correspondence was shaped by the nineteenth-century context and particularly by challenges to the Mennonites' beliefs, values, and way of life during this period. It is essential to consider the context in which these records were created to understand the records themselves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibraries & the Cultural RecordSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207